Sport + institutional governance · NSAG applied
SPORT — Nervous-System-Aware Athletic Governance
Public applied-framework concept · assessment and commercial release blocked
Apply Nervous-System-Aware Governance to athletic institutions and athlete welfare.
Controlled visual demonstration
Current live interface
This sandboxed preview shows the current public interface. Open the full site to use the build in its intended window.
What I noticed
Sports organizations govern athlete nervous-system inputs through schedules, travel, training and recovery expectations, facilities, organizational culture, media obligations, and career transitions, yet those decisions are usually separated across coaching, operations, welfare, and communications. That fragmentation can hide cumulative load and make performance or wellbeing effects difficult to document as institutional outputs.
What I researched
SPORT applies NSAG modules M5, M8, and M15 through six assessment dimensions: physical environment; schedule and recovery; travel and logistical stress; psychological safety and culture; media and public-facing stress; and development and career transition. The public framework distinguishes adaptive from impairing stress, places developmental stage and athlete agency inside governance, and proposes source-backed policies and outcome measures instead of treating awareness or wearable data as sufficient evidence.
What exists
A six-dimension governance system spanning load, recovery, scheduling, travel, cognitive performance, psychological environments, and organizational culture.
Who it serves
Athletic organizations, teams, governing bodies, coaches, and athlete-welfare leaders.
What it demonstrates
Framework extension, sport governance, welfare-system design, and institution-level assessment.
Current evidence
The live NSAG-applied concept verifies the six-dimension framework, five-question readiness diagnostic, signal-versus-noise guidance, glossary, hypothetical before-and-after examples, proposed Athlete's Nervous System Audit, ninety-day roadmap, and tiered engagement architecture. It does not verify an assessment, team or league engagement, client pipeline, completed audit, roadmap implementation, improved performance, reduced injury, athlete-welfare outcome, or institutional adoption. References to F1, LA28, NCAA materials, study findings, risk percentages, and evidence currency require direct source verification and should not imply affiliation, access, endorsement, or a validated causal effect. SPORT is an institutional-design and assessment concept—not medical care, coaching, legal advice, accreditation, or a guarantee of health or competitive outcomes.
Verified build record
What is actually running, and what it is not.
LiveLive
The problem. Athlete welfare policies are written at the level of principle and then have to survive contact with scheduling, recovery, safeguarding and a young person's actual ability to raise a concern. The gap between the policy and the week is where the harm lives.
What it does. Runs a programme and decision scan across scheduling, recovery, safeguarding, environment, athlete voice and escalation, then produces an owned action register and a 90-day governance roadmap with named responsibility and an independent response and review path.
Built on. A static browser application with local persistence, plus privacy and terms pages, served from Vercel.
What it does not establish. Issue-spotting for a governance conversation. Not a safeguarding audit and not a clinical or legal determination.
This record is generated from the same inventory as the complete build index: the production URL was checked at the last regeneration, and the status line above repeats what the build reports about itself rather than restating an intention.